My question logically stems from the observation that such organizations, companies, and governments are composed of individuals who may or may not have strong feelings about the so-called violation of privacy that presents itself online. I once read in PsychologyToday (I know super trashy and I can't find a link!) about a study that showed, maybe somewhat ironically, that people who did not gossip were less trusted by their peers. What do these results signify about the perception of privacy? The study concluded that sharing information via gossiping was a form of trust building and intimating close connection between individuals. Gossiping or sharing? It's a fine line, right?
At the end of the day, I do believe that "sharing means caring" and I keep that in mind in my Facebook activity. My status updates aren't just sharing about the intimate details of my daily life but also articles, links, and jokes that I've come across during the day. If you're not creating this type of "entertainment and information" value for your network, then maybe you're not serving your friends (I'm looking at YOU people who post their daily schedules and what you ate for dinner). At least, that's what I think.
![]() |
| Source |
For more info on different kinds of privacy, I really enjoyed reading Christopher's break down of the 4 kinds of privacies!

No comments:
Post a Comment