1. Assign SHORT relevant online (youtube videos, blogs and articles are good) pre-class readings to be done BEFORE the Elluminate.
Pro: Gets you ready to discuss the current week's topic in class without burdening you. Also, it enables you to spot any areas you may need to ask questions in. The amount is so manageable that you can read everything an hour before class starts in order to be really fresh.
Con: Sometimes this can add too much work to the week.
2. Spend first few minutes discussing some of the things students produced for the class the week before, share insights and puzzles, give props to good work, quote our work in your slides!
Pro: This proves that you care about our work and that you are reading what we write. Also, helps us feel more connected to the rest of the class and allows us to comment and discuss.
Con: May cut into "lecture time."
3. Spend a few minutes to call on individuals to summarize the pre-readings.
Pro: Shows the readings are meaningful to the course and you can cover and discuss the basics of each article out loud. Also, some of us may not have gotten to read every single article so this is good to get everyone on the same page.
Con: It's possible that no one has read the pre-readings. This could be because there was too much assigned or because the connection to the week's topic was not made in the readings and people lost motivation when asking themselves, "why is this relevant?"
4. Let the pre-reading discussion go into the lecture time: lectures should be short, like 20 to 30 min with comprehensive slides.
Pro: A great lecture should expand on the pre-Elluminate readings, not summarize or repeat them.
Con: This may be a hard way to do complex topics that should not be over-simplified. But these topics can be expanded upon in the post-class readings. So, it's not necessary to go into crazy depth in class.
5. End the class with a summary of what is due by the end of the week and the topics of what will be covered next week.
Pro: Keeps us in the loop and on track about assignments in case there are any differences or updates. Allows for questions about discrepancies. Helps maintain continuity of the course instead of the class just ending on a random note.
Con: Unless prof. is very good with timing, this could make the class go over time.
Excellent post, Nina. You've captured the spirit of how I expience an Elluminate learning session facilitated by Chris A. His methods generally let me know where we're going before taking us there, as well as having points throughout to check back and see what we've covered.
ReplyDeleteI do have one comment, which I kind of/sort of address in my own post here: http://bit.ly/9ytwdE - and that is, we need Best Practices for the Elluminate Learner (aka "the student") as well as those for instructors. Using true back-channeling would free up the Elluminate chat area, which is best left for course related questions. Likewise, all participants having and using a mic/headset; being present and ready to jump in without the age-old "is this thing on?" question so many of us (I've done it, too) fall back on; coming prepared to present material if called upon and not waiting when no one steps up to answer a question. Time, especially in an online class, is of the essence.
Thanks for your comment. I totally agree with the need for a post on "Best Practices for the Elluminate Learner." Personally, it would be difficult for me to follow some of those best practices you outlined (in particular, being prepared to present material if called upon) because so many professors do not follow #1 up above and I'm constantly scrambling to read and digest the tomes we are assigned without knowing where I should focus (Christopher A. does this) and what the key take-aways should be. I always end up missing the "main ideas."
ReplyDeleteWell, you have to pick your row to hoe, so to speak. You can have bredth or depth, but at the speed of a 12 week term, generally not both. Just how it's going for me and the 10 credits I've obligated myself to complete.
ReplyDelete